The wind-versus-flood problem, and why it decides your settlement
Anti-concurrent causation language in most Texas policies means that when a covered peril and an excluded peril combine to cause a loss, the insurer may deny the whole thing. In practice, that turns hurricane claims into a fight over sequence: did the wind open the roof before the surge arrived, or did the water get there first?
This is decided on evidence — high-water marks, debris lines, the pattern of interior damage, the direction of the material failure, and the timeline of the storm as it crossed the address. Established early, that record supports claims under both policies. Left to be argued later, it typically supports neither.


